I am hardly for Santorum in any respect but I did watch the exchange in which he lost his temper with a NYTimes reporter. In my view Santorum had it right, in context. And he is even more right now. Santorum is being interpreted as saying what he did not actually say. And this to me is an indication of a general knee-jerk or lockstep myopia on the liberal media side. We do not need Santorum to tell us how inadequate Romney is. Memes are like gossip. They grow and gain traction regardless of their truth..
How about we divide society into three types and then concede that all three are parts of everyone? In other words, we start thinking of individuals as a spectrum and not in terms that limit their freedom to be what they can be.
There is first the person who has no need of a physician, to use one of Jesus' phrases. Perhaps the largest bulk of humanity are those who function with a measure of responsibility, a measure of tolerance, a measure of helpfulness and a measure of democratic willingness to grant the same rights to all.
Next is the person Jesus designates as a sinner. He does not use this as an invidious designation. It is more a matter of fact acknowledgement that some, for whatever reason, engage in conscious wrong-doing. Some are compelled to do wrong. Sex workers. Child soldiers. Others - everyone actually - just does it.
Finally, there is the person who has power over others and misuses it, intentionally or not.
A new sociology would begin with a universal unders…
I am also saddened that the Republican party of today thinks I wanted God in the White House and to rule the nation. That is not true at all, after I was nearly assassinated I wanted God more in my own personal life. I acknowledged that I was to be here for a reason and serve him and my nation together, but they always stayed separate in my mind just as in the Constitution. The Republican party today merely just uses God as a means to get votes, - Ronald Reagan