Showing posts with label cyber-community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyber-community. Show all posts
3/11/13
The car abets obesity / The girth is there for all to see
1/19/13
Think of Making Business Come to You
1/18/13
Open Source Economics can work in the US under current law

11/21/12
Dear Jeff Bezos, here's your big idea. You can do this.
11/10/12
My Progressive Proposal Par Excellence Time for A Mass Migration
Election Data Dive - NYTimes.com: " Romney also won eight of the 10 states with the lowest population density: Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, Nebraska and Utah. "
'via Blog this'
Every one of my posts is an introduction to this blog which is an introduction to angles of visions shared by many but realized by few.
Part of the problem is one of expression, my own. I know what I want to see but I cannot draw it or even describe it very well.
But it is the solution in almost every area - politics, society whatever.
So here is a chunk. We could profit massively from a mass migration.
We do not need to be in this or that city. With a bit of brain power we could create the cells of urban living anywhere at all.
So go to the states where Romney won. Buy up defunct towns. Build new car-free cities on high enough ground that they will not flood when it rains.
We can solve the problem of polarization and social injustice by making residence voluntary and building in diversity from the gitgo.
Communities would have populations of 5-10K and everything within a walk of up to a mile.
Communities would be car free.
Construction would be cyber-eco past the clunkiness of most comtemporary construction.
This will revolutionize the whole world because it will involve applying smarts to human settlements and introduce community safety and weather-resistance into the discussion ,
Oh, and ...
Once we have the majority in these states we can sleep better on election night.
6/11/12
Has the computer reduced chldhood to dross
5/22/12
Cyber-community 101 - Lesson Three
A cyber-community must be dense enough
to enable growth of a viable local economy
Why is this so
In the United States we suffer from
too much dispersion in rural areas
No local economy can thrive there
In our metro areas
a combination of zoning
and concentration
inhibits the growth of natural
economies
A reasonable density for a viable local
economy
is between 5,000 and 10,000
Such populations can support
local versions of
commercial
residential
cultural
educational
health
and recreational
facilities
These can be staffed by local people
A viable local economy will need in the future
to generate its own energy
When a community is dense enough
and is free of most or all automobile traffic
it can develop new ways of
energy generation
even including energy generated by
human activity
and human interaction with
such things as
turbines
and pendulums
developed for fitness
and play purposes
In the future people will choose diversity
characteristic of cities
in preference to monochromatic
stratified sprawl existence
Communities as envisioned here
can exist in close proximity
4/27/12
Twelve Reasons Romney is Going Down as We Speak
Surrounded by neo-cons who counsel war
Tied to Rove and the Koch Brothers
Identified with Bork and overturning Rowe v Wade
Health care conundrum
Foreign policy flops
Horrendous media advice
Foreign policy flops
Horrendous media advice
Tepid and borderline endorsements
No honeymoon bounce
Past statements come home to roost
No place to pivot to
The GOP Congress
On all accounts an undesirable risk
People's solution -
Democratic majorities in Congress
Re-election of the President
Progressive solution -
Think beyond oil and sprawl and how
a commitment to that could revolutionize
our economy and politics
our economy and politics
Consider how election of Romney would
set things back
4/6/12
Cyber-Community Broadside Number One
10K persons diverse in every way living
in an area made car free
Sharing a common structure for eco-sustainability
beyond the reach of any individual to afford
Having within walking distance education
health recreation dwellings commercial ventures
squares small play grounds
A public space
as attracting to people as private spaces
Click to enlarge
What is a cyber-enabled car-free community?
10K persons diverse in every way living
in an area made car free
Sharing a common structure for eco-sustainability
beyond the reach of any individual to afford
Having within walking distance education
health recreation dwellings commercial ventures
squares small play grounds
A public space
as attracting to people as private spaces
Dwellings and all other structures
made of modular mass-produced elements
including smart walls and other surfaces
built-in structures for furniture and work sspaces
in a safe and cord-free
environment
In a cyber-community most present
education and commerce runs out of
kiosk-like small facilities
that are open much of the time
Education would be at once freer
and more interactive
Everything would be
Current institutions would adapt to the new form
but have functions similar to existing functions
People would live and work in the cyber-community
Most elements of the global culture would be
available to all in an adaptation of today's
sports bars
Cyber-communities can spring up
anywhere and become safe face to face
environments for persons who live by
the shared values of democracy
helpfulness tolerance and non-idolatry
A cyber-community is not a utopia
It is a grass-roots democracy that
runs as most town governments do
Moving beyond oil, detached sprawl
housing and cars is inevitable because
it creates a system that cannot be
afforded in the future
while doing nothing to make society
more fulfilling
For more please click the
cyber-community label below
Neither Party Understands the Economy
The economy will not recover
Because the car industry was saved
The economy will not recover
Because there is an uptick in housing purchases or construction
The economy will not recover because either party
now has the policies to lead it toward new prosperity
Stasis and sclerosis will endure while both parties
compound delay by arguing for mutually wrong premises
You ask what is the right course
Simply this
Concede that the triumvirate of sprawl
oil dominance and the related businesses
is anemic and a recipe for a century of
sclerosis war and untold poverty
Concede that a properly densified society
with communities of around 10K
Zoned for everything needed to live
Car free
Built on modular principles
with a shared-ecostructure
Is the right track
Concede that the correct approach is outlined here
under the label cyber-community
The future must be sprawl free
Car free
Face to face community
Enabled by cyber-means
That nobody who should have seen this saw it
is cause for some skepticism that this simple answer
will be known in time to make a difference
4/5/12
Mucho Info on Pinterist Virality and Lego Walls
Going Viral on Pinterest: Driving Big Traffic and Making Pinterest a Real Marketing Solution | SEOmoz:
'via Blog this'
I liked the part about the Lego Wall the best. Legois the model for the future - for the modular structures of the car-free cyber-community that will become the antidote to sprawl.
Charles Sanders Peirce - Thinking in Threes
'via Blog this'
I liked the part about the Lego Wall the best. Legois the model for the future - for the modular structures of the car-free cyber-community that will become the antidote to sprawl.
3/31/12
Why Cyber-Communities Will Replace Sprawl
3/13/12
Help make cyber-community a reality.
Cyber community is my term for what I believe is an entirely new concept for the reformulation of how the world lives. A cyber-community has a general limit of around 10,000 people. Enough for a vibrant local economy. A cyber community is car free, compressed enough to have most social and many wider needs met within a walk of no more than a mile. It is low rise - a max of around four levels. It begs for architectural and design imagination, eco-vision and awareness of how today's society has become dysfunctional due to a lack of face to face community and social stratification. You live, work and play in a cyber community. Quite obviously you also solve the warming problem at the root, by eliminating the necessity for cars. Help make cyber-community a reality.
Charles Sanders Peirce - Thinking in Threes
3/9/12
Krugman is the most almost-right writer in the universe
Krugman because is almost right all the time. He is right in blaming the GOP for its criminal performance.
But he is very wrong on most economic questions for a very simple reason.
We have committed ourselves to a social matrix that is inherently unable to survive in its present form. There can be no recovery of education, of housing, of transportation. Each of these is part of the problem, not an answer. All of these enterprises are predicated on the "self-evident" of continuing automobile use, continued need for stand-alone houses and continued capacity to afford and benefit from the educational system that we have.
The solution lies in a transition to concentrations of population that can generate bottom-up economies, a recalibration of enterprise so it can serve car-free cyber-communities of up to 10K persons each. These communities would be zoned for everything and essentially emulate cities of the past that were self-enclosed. All current institutions would be resized to serve the cyber-community and thus provide employment to its residents.
Cyber-communities could and would operate at roughly half the expense of maintaining our sprawl society. Cyber-communities would be able to afford eco-sustainability. They would be culturally alive. They would be diverse.
Krugman joins many public intellectuals in rejecting the need for a social sea change. We have had no discussion of these matters since the 1960s when four bullets stopped all discussion for more a half-century.
Charles Sanders Peirce - Thinking in Threes
But he is very wrong on most economic questions for a very simple reason.
We have committed ourselves to a social matrix that is inherently unable to survive in its present form. There can be no recovery of education, of housing, of transportation. Each of these is part of the problem, not an answer. All of these enterprises are predicated on the "self-evident" of continuing automobile use, continued need for stand-alone houses and continued capacity to afford and benefit from the educational system that we have.
The solution lies in a transition to concentrations of population that can generate bottom-up economies, a recalibration of enterprise so it can serve car-free cyber-communities of up to 10K persons each. These communities would be zoned for everything and essentially emulate cities of the past that were self-enclosed. All current institutions would be resized to serve the cyber-community and thus provide employment to its residents.
Cyber-communities could and would operate at roughly half the expense of maintaining our sprawl society. Cyber-communities would be able to afford eco-sustainability. They would be culturally alive. They would be diverse.
Krugman joins many public intellectuals in rejecting the need for a social sea change. We have had no discussion of these matters since the 1960s when four bullets stopped all discussion for more a half-century.
3/8/12
Regions of between 2 and 10 million are an ideal basis for governance
Without a region in which at least 2 million live and move and have their being, we are condemned either to gross congestion or the atrophy of too few people to sustain the basic elements of living.
What my notion of cyber-communities and cyber-cities does is build from the bottom up toward such a regional concept. A cyber-community of up to 10,000 persons can be built from the existing settlements and eventually replace them. These can be connected by yet-to-be invented evolutions of buses and trains - public transit. All communities will be walkable. A cluster of 10 cyber-communities would nest within a larger region containing 100 cyber-communities. A region could consist of from two to ten such nested elements.
Human governance needs to be accessable to communities that are themselves intelligible as living areas. A cyber-community is such a unit. Ten such suggest a reasonable city size.Individual communities would contain a few of the larger structures. Many presently large structures would be be scaled down to function in the cyber-communities. For example a cyber-community would have infirmaries but a hospital would exist to serve ten cyber-communities.
Because cyber communities would be global and trump distances by means of technology there is no reason why, in a nation like the United States, such communities could not be created de-novo anywhere.
Elsewhere I have suggested that interstates be the likely locations for cyber communities.
We lack anything close to an ideal distribution of communities and population
A cyber-metropolis would be a regional cluster of ten or so cyber-cities.
The genius of this scheme is that a walkable, car-free community can be built in an area a mile square, a miniscule amount of space. A population of 100,000 could be served by an aggregate of just ten cyber-communities. Creation along these lines would revolutionize manufacturing because the components would all represent new inventions and designs, from the matrix needed to make each cyber-community ecologically sustainable to the mass-produced but customized elements of structures and spaces within the cyber-community.
How do we begin to take what we have now, subservient to the car and oil, and morph it into cyber-communities?. We do it first by creating cyber-communities de novo, from scratch. When we find a gutsy entrepreneur who is tired of gadget-capitalism, the fun can begin.
3/7/12
Imagining Cyber-Communities

The image above is not my idea of anything but the general
size and heft of a cyber-community. It suggests a matrix
which holds and supports the modular elements which
enclose spaces within the community. It suggests the height,
the walkability within its precincts, And one can readily
infer that 5000-10,000 could live in such spaces and have
plenty of room for other spaces and areas which would
provide any community anywhere with all the institutions
and amenities we associate with urbanity, with the city.
A reason why Pattern Language (the book) is ignored
I think one reason Pattern Language (the book) is ignored is that it is predicated on the continued domination of the car. It assumes we will be driving forever. Thus when Alexander dismisses the suburb, he does not take the step of going back and admitting that Frank Lloyd Wright was wrong in assuming suburbanites would all have their own veggie gardens, responsibly turning the suburbs into a sort of nuclear family utopia, while at the same time drawing lovely interchanges and inadvertently, perhaps, suggesting the coming invasion of the cars. Alexander and Wright fell to the blandishments of the car. The sort of erroneous distortion of reality that surfaces in the noxious Ram ads now invading TV. The beauteous countryside has an able partner -- Ram! Think the worst.
Had Alexander taken the bull by the horns and assumed the crying need for car-free communities, and anticipated the technology that would make the rebuilding of the world not only possible but a good idea,
he might have taken a simple page from Doxiadis and accepted the natural tendency of people to gather at intersections.
Gathering at intersections is why my front yard (the intersection of Broadway, Sizth Avenue and 34th Street is at times the most crowded in NYC. And why we have metropolises. The cyber-community, the car free zoned for everything evolution of the human settlement, is the natural result of putting together the impossibility of sprawl and the inevitability of concentrations of population.
Economy is living with the least amount of unnecessary expense
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













