8/30/11

It may boil down to a refusal to speak anonymously

WikiLeaks Leaves Names of Diplomatic Sources in Cables - NYTimes.com:

This entire story does not reveal a scintilla of what is in the cables. It is entirely taken up with suggesting that Wikileaks has been careless with its redactions. I find myself wondering whether anyone in their right mind should reveal anything to an official source unless they agree to be and perhaps insist that they be identified. The reverse of careful anonymity is intentional visibility.



Global Online Privacy

No comments:

RECCMENDATION Richard Gordon Quantum Touch

The Slow as Molasses Press