Where Peirce and I agree wholeheartedly

Where Peirce and I agree wholeheartedlyIs in how he defines philosophy“an experiential, or positive science, but a science which rests on no special observations, made by special observational means, but on phenomena which lie open to the observation of every man, every day and hour” (CP 7.526)
Cap tip Gary F.
My commentWere Peirce living now he might degenderizeBut I think this opens semiotics asWhat takes place all the time in all mindsLike spermatazoa a plethoraWill just pass through or byBut when a rare one connects withThought Which through the interaction of sign and interpreterBecomes actA prelude to a habit or hypothesis or followupSomething actual and real to usA candidate among a million othersFor advancement to beingYet another signThen yet another
Signs go on and on and on In layer after layerNest after nestAnd all minds contribute To the same process
Semiotics is merely an effort to describe how this may work
Global Online Privacy