The Mitt Said To Have "Won" The Debate Is a Predatory Jackal and Pathological Liar

Like everyone else I have been trying to make sense of things I have seen Mitt's bump Before the first debate came noxious GOP voter suppression efforts and  noxious GOP lying ads  funded by deluded billionaires who owe their wealth to the President they hate These efforts give four percent off the poll gap to Mitt Given the six point gap Obama needs just to squeak by we are now under threat I did not see it that way during the debate I saw Mitt as a predatory jackal rudely advancing unrestrained lie after unrestrained bald-faced lie  But from the subsequent wailing wall at MSNBC to dissembling Right Wing glee the verdict was Mitt won Now I know why Enough Americans believed a man they met only once Mitt's bald-faced lies were truth to them They had never known different It takes little effort to establish the three points needed to re-achieve an Obama edge POINT ONE Reassert the portrait of Mitt set forth before the debate It's only part of what is true about Mitt Reveal MORE truth from Gawker and Vanity Fair, etc. The Right will cry foul but there is just too much there POINT TWO Say Mitt was no different in the debate than before it Only his lies changed Point to the risks. Use the lie word Stop being nice The American people want Democrats to show backbone Call the media on such things as assuming that Romney is doing something great when he promises them exactly the number of jobs that are anticipated to be gained no matter who is president POINT THREE Refute the argument that Mitt is flexible (like Reagan) Today's GOP itself is not the GOP of the Reagan era It is the child of the Ryan era The you're on your own era The screw the middle class forget the poor era The war on women kill government era SO If people want to hold a binary view of Mitt they are welcome to do so but we must point out that he would be a governing disaster and say why
Stephen's Remarkable Kindle Store