The one and the many has to do
with patterns common to all.
Heteronomy implies a something beyond one
that has influence or control.
The concern of the one and the many is with patterns
related to how the cosmos or universe works.
The first is broader and more supposition than the second.
One could infer influences on an artist
but it would be more of a guess to say
that one is essentially creative
because the universe is made up of nano elements
that possess freedom.
Or that we are as we are because A = B
or does not.
Or because entropy is real or not.
The artist is never entirely autonomous
because there are always
known and unknown patterns
that might well be universal
as well as particular influences.
We are never entirely autonomous
or individual
IMO.
Stephen's Remarkable Kindle Store
Buffer