His name is C. S. Peirce not Charley

« The Greatest Living American Philosopher Commentary Magazine http://buff.ly/1kYUPZz

Interesting article and reason enough 
for a Triadic Philosophy 
that seeks precisely to 
demonstrate that generals 
are capable of surviving 
scientific analysis 
and proving their 
practical efficacy. 

I would assume that 
that does not float well 
in a recondite Peircean environment. 

Understandably so and 
good enough reason to 
build beyond 
while making no claim 
to build on Peirce. 

I do find the use of 
the name Charley 
in various contexts 
including this article 
somewhat precious.

The Slow as Molasses Press