Interesting article and reason enough
for a Triadic Philosophy
that seeks precisely to
demonstrate that generals
are capable of surviving
scientific analysis
and proving their
practical efficacy.
I would assume that
that does not float well
in a recondite Peircean environment.
Understandably so and
good enough reason to
build beyond
while making no claim
to build on Peirce.
Nonetheless
I do find the use of
the name Charley
in various contexts
including this article
somewhat precious.