'via Blog this'
Nate awards February to Romney but qualifies his narrow margins by suggesting risks. The main story continues to be Romney's unseemly use of money to overpower opponents, relying on the media's general willingness to suggest that such a contest reflects the will of the people and is therefore democratic. I am waiting to see what would happen if the media began to make money the measure and gave up the current distorted narrative. We are in a cointest between the power of wall-to-wall ads and the capacity of people to not take that anymore. If the latter force wins, then Romney and all his money can go back and lick wounds in the mansion he is rebuilding in California.
Charles Sanders Peirce - Thinking in Threes
