My Reasons for Starting Renewal Magazine and The Movement It Failed to Sustain
I
was hired by Don Benedict to create and run an exploratory program in
journalism in Chicago beginning in the fall of 1961. This was an entirely novel
opportunity and I do not exaggerate. Fortified by what was then a large
endowment, Benedict could afford to experiment in an effort to renew and
perhaps alter the trajectory of churches in the inner city. It is not an
exaggeration also to suggest I was uniquely qualified, not only with a degree
from Union Seminary, but with over a decade of journalistic experience both at
Exeter and Williams and on the New Republic. I plunged into the work and during
the first months produced a series of radio documentaries on the inner city,
covered the "murder" trial of Lee Arthur Hester and issued a special
publication called the Albany Report which recounted the experience of Chicago
ministers seeking to achieve racial justice in the deep South. I had spent the
summer before coming to Chicago in the Student Interracial Ministry as
assistant minister at Nashville's First Baptist Church, working for the late
Kelly Miller Smith. As a result I also toured Southern seminaries talking
about the Nashville experience. All of this provides a clear backdrop for
discussing the founding of Renewal Magazine and of the networks which at the
time supported a measure of change in the churches. The impact of Dr. King and
of those who were involved at the time was huge and the reason was not merely
that the cause was just, but because the media of the time sensed the winds of
change and were drawn to its agents. The story of Renewal cannot be told
without noting the key role played by the interest of the media in the
stirrings in a small but vocal part of the church. Renewal was the name the
Society had for its newsletter. I took it and converted it into a single theme
magazine appearing ten times a year. It began with an issue on capital punishment
and went on from there. Single theme issues sold in bulk resulted in what was then a
considerable circulation bump. Within a year it became common to sell issues in
the tens and even hundreds of thousands. Because our theme was making the
churches relevant and because there was at least some interest brewing in the
unfolding years of the 1960s, Renewal prospered. The design of the
magazine gave lavish place to original black and white photography and soon I
turned each issue over to a particular photographer who exchanged work for a
portfolio in effect. The same trade worked with established journalists, I
became friends with many and many more agreed to write gratis. Lois Wille,
Georgie Anne Geyer, Ron Bailie, Arlie Schardt, Chris Porterfield, Miriam
Rumwell and Burk Uzzle are names that come to mind. Since then-powerful media
like TIME and Newsweek had lively religion sections, I became what would now be
the equivalent of a talking head on TV. Books resulted. And Renewal Magazine
eventually expanded to include New York with the addition of the late Jim
McGraw as New York editor. Looking back, it is possible to describe the network
of progressive sorts who sought to move the churches as follows. The epicenter
was then Chicago and the prime mover was Don Benedict. There were folk in
national ecumenical and denominational circles who were sympathetic. By 1968
one could see, however, that this heady sense of a "renewal movement"
was composed more of hope than substance. Denominations did not change in their
fundamental allegiance to things as they had been. In the seminal book I
produced in the 1960s, The Grass Roots Church,I think I correctly admitted
exactly what H. Richard Niebuhr had said at Union in 1960 - we were lacking in
theology, in a declension of reality that could move us beyond the flaccid dyad
made up of fundamentalism on one side and a vapid cultural mainline on the
other. It was obvious even then that the mainline would decline and the
fundamentalists would rise. And the cities would decline in a dance of injustice building out to the sprawl that continued to ravage the metroscape for many decades more. By the time a succession of assassinations, more
numerous than generally remembered, had written the fate of the 1960s on the
wall in blood, the die of the following decades had been cast. For someone like
myself, a child of some privilege faced with what I regarded as a wholesale act
of almost cosmic racism, and ending up with no purchase on even a right to speak in the
new environment of polarization, I was at decade's end a self-exiled former
editor of Renewal. It would take the remainder of the century to clear the
theological deck of dross. And another ten years of substantial re-education to
arrive at the views I now seek to share and propagate.